IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i1p87-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reduction of maternal care: a new benefit of multiple mating?

Author

Listed:
  • Shou-Hsien Li

Abstract

Cost/benefit analyses have been used to understand the evolution of mating by females with multiple males, as in extrapair copulations (EPCs), which are now known to occur commonly in socially monogamous and polygynous birds. Indirect (genetic) benefits have been invoked to explain such mating patterns in some cases, but direct benefits have received less attention. We report a study of direct benefits in the communally rearing Mexican jay (Aphelocoma ultramarina). The social mate of the mother (putative father) is the most reliable feeder of the young in his nest, regardless of cuckoldry. Feedings provided by social fathers are not reduced in relation to their paternity loss. In contrast, mothers having nestlings sired by a second male tend to have lower feeding rates than those without such young. Secondary fathers provided a significantly higher level of feeding to the brood of their female than did (1) random nonbreeders of all ages and both sexes, (2) random male nonbreeders of all ages, and (3) older (2+ years), male nonbreeders. Surprisingly, however, broods with two fathers did not receive a higher level of total feeding, despite our observation that two-father broods had two more helpers, on average, compared to broods without extra fathers. Regardless of age or breeding status, males were more frequent feeders than females. This study provides the first evidence that one of the major costs of reproduction, maternal care of nestlings, is reduced for females that have young sired by secondary males. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Shou-Hsien Li, 2002. "Reduction of maternal care: a new benefit of multiple mating?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(1), pages 87-93, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:87-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:87-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.