The Market for U.S. Livestock Feed Proteins
Parameters that characterize markets for livestock feed ingredients and inform an increasing array of policies motivated by a range of environmental, market, and animal disease issues are largely absent from the literature, which necessitates the use of often misleading assumptions in analyses of proposed feed-market policies. Such parameters are derived here from a theoretically consistent, dual translog cost model of U.S. protein and energy feed markets. Own-price elasticities ranged from a relatively inelastic −0.139 for feedgrains to a relatively elastic −0.568 for meat and bone meal (MBM). The cross elasticity for ethanol co-products and oilseed meals (0.168) is larger than the elasticity with co-products and feedgrains (0.024). Higher prices for protein feeds likely result in some substitution of feed grains for some protein (e.g. corn by oilseed meals = 0.125), which may also partially account for the relatively small feedgrains cross elasticity. Policies implemented as a result of bovine splongiform encephalopathy adversely affected the share of total costs attributed to MBM, but had a positive effect on oilseed meal cost share. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.
Volume (Year): 34 (2012)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK|
Phone: (414) 918-3190
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://aepp.oxfordjournals.org/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:4:p:555-569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.