IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/amlawe/v17y2015i1p160-191..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analogical Legal Reasoning: Theory and Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua C. Teitelbaum

Abstract

The paper offers a formal model of analogical legal reasoning and takes the model to data. Under the model, the outcome of a new case is a weighted average of the outcomes of prior cases. The weights capture precedential influence and depend on fact similarity (distance in fact space) and precedential authority (position in the judicial hierarchy). The empirical analysis suggests that the model is a plausible model for the time series of U.S. maritime salvage cases. Moreover, the results evince that prior cases decided by inferior courts have less influence than those decided by superior courts.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua C. Teitelbaum, 2015. "Analogical Legal Reasoning: Theory and Evidence," American Law and Economics Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 160-191.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:17:y:2015:i:1:p:160-191.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aler/ahu011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:17:y:2015:i:1:p:160-191.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/aler .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.