Delegated Monitoring: When Can Boards Rely on Outside Experts?
This paper provides a theoretical model to examine when and how boards of directors can utilize outside experts who provide second opinions to assist them in 1) monitoring managers with career concerns and 2) approving firm investments. Because an agreeable second opinion serves as a signaling mechanism, when such opinions are credible, policies mandating the use of experts are unnecessary as managers will choose to seek out second opinions on their own. Mandates can be counterproductive, however, if they unduly elevate the status of costly second opinions that always agree with management recommendations. In the absence of incentives for truthful disclosure of information to experts, it is better for boards to forego efforts to and require management and experts to present their recommendations as one. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 14 (2012)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK|
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://www.aler.oupjournals.org/
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:271-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.