IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v92y2010i5p1420-1431.html

Separation Hypothesis Tests in the Agricultural Household Model

Author

Listed:
  • Kien T. Le

Abstract

In an agricultural household model, farmers' production decisions can be either separated or nonseparated from preferences. Since previous studies on agricultural household behavior and policy effects have shown that the model with separation yields different results than the model with nonseparation, it is important to have a test to identify the correct model. This paper provides new tests that extend current tests in two directions. First, the new tests avoid issues that current tests have to address, such as simultaneity bias and the estimation of the production function. Second, the new tests make use of more information implied from the separation hypothesis than current tests. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Kien T. Le, 2010. "Separation Hypothesis Tests in the Agricultural Household Model," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1420-1431.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:92:y:2010:i:5:p:1420-1431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aaq070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:92:y:2010:i:5:p:1420-1431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.