IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v69y1987i3p523-531..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Further Toward a Theory of Agricultural Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Carl H. Nelson
  • Edna T. Loehman

Abstract

The economic theory of contracts is applied to agricultural insurance to show that, given full information, Pareto-optimal insurance contracts are actuarially fair, provide full coverage, and differ for each individual. The information problems of moral hazard and adverse selection prevent Pareto optimality from being attained. Several "second-best" solutions to these problems are applied to agricultural insurance. It is shown that information collection and the application of contract design principles are "second-best" solutions which may achieve the benefits of insurance at less cost than the current practice of public subsidies.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl H. Nelson & Edna T. Loehman, 1987. "Further Toward a Theory of Agricultural Insurance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(3), pages 523-531.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:69:y:1987:i:3:p:523-531.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1241688
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:69:y:1987:i:3:p:523-531.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.