IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v67y1985i4p717-725..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Political Economy of Extension Program Design: Institutional Maintenance Issues in the Organization and Delivery of Extension Programs

Author

Listed:
  • George R. McDowell

Abstract

Besides its educational function, extension is expected to generate political support for the land grant universities. The necessary conditions for extension programs to elicit political support are for them to (a) be a positive net benefit, (b) be clearly attributable to extension, (c) be feasible of political solicitation, and (d) have benefits of sufficient magnitude to motivate political action. The characteristics of programs that affect these conditions are the attributes of (a) incompatible use, (b) exclusion costs, and (c) joint impact. The instrument of program design that influences these attributes is the degree to which information is particularized to a specific audience.

Suggested Citation

  • George R. McDowell, 1985. "The Political Economy of Extension Program Design: Institutional Maintenance Issues in the Organization and Delivery of Extension Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(4), pages 717-725.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:67:y:1985:i:4:p:717-725.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1241810
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wright, P. D. & Nieuwoudt, W. L., 1993. "The Political Economy Of The South African Dairy Industry: A Public Choice Analysis," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 32(1), March.
    2. McDowell, George R., 1993. "Structural Change In Higher Education: Implications For Agricultural Economics Extension; Or Does Diffedence, Decadence And Dissonance Make A Difference?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-7, July.
    3. Bitsch, Vera & Ferris, Ted & Lee, Katherine L. & McFadden, Mike & Ross, Dean, 2008. "Extension Educators Collecting Industry-specific Stakeholder Input," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 43249, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Lohr, Luanne & Hesterman, Oran & Kells, James & Landis, Douglas & Mutch, Dale, 1991. "Building An Interdisciplinary Team for Extension Education in Sustainable Agriculture," Staff Paper Series 201139, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    5. Loveridge, Scott & Parliament, Claudia & Morse, George W., 1992. "Building Partnerships Between Extension Economists And Agents: Lessons From The Bush Fellowship Program In Community Economics," Staff Papers 13241, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:67:y:1985:i:4:p:717-725.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.