IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v48y1966i3_part_ip728-737..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Further Look at P.L. 480 and the Balance of Payments

Author

Listed:
  • Jimmye S. Hillman
  • Murray R. Benedict

Abstract

The present methods of balance-of-payments accounting which show that P.L. 480 shipments have no effect on U.S. balance of payments are misleading. The P.L. 480 program may have important side effects on U.S. and competitor-country sales and hence have an indirect influence on balance of payments. The adverse effects of U.S. aid programs on the U.S. balance of payments can be overemphasized because a substantial part of that aid is tied to purchasing in the United States. The present U.S. balance-of-payments account also reveals little about the effects of P.L. 480 exports on national income. The experience with the Marshall Plan should be reviewed to gain insights leading to possible improvements in P.L. 480.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimmye S. Hillman & Murray R. Benedict, 1966. "A Further Look at P.L. 480 and the Balance of Payments," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 48(3_Part_I), pages 728-737.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:48:y:1966:i:3_part_i:p:728-737.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1236872
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:48:y:1966:i:3_part_i:p:728-737.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.