IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v101y2019i4p1164-1180..html

Incentives and the Diffusion of Agricultural Knowledge: Experimental Evidence from Northern Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Kelvin Mashisia Shikuku
  • Janneke Pieters
  • Erwin Bulte
  • Peter Läderach

Abstract

We present results of a randomized evaluation that assesses the effects of different incentives for diffusion of agricultural knowledge by smallholders in northern Uganda. Randomly-selected disseminating farmers (DFs) from a large sample of villages are assigned to one of three experimental arms: (a) training about climate smart agriculture, (b) training plus a material reward for knowledge diffusion, and (c) training plus a reputational gain for knowledge diffusion. We find that leveraging somebody’s reputation (or social recognition) has a positive impact on DFs’ experimentation and diffusion effort. This impact is stronger than that measured in the private material rewards treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelvin Mashisia Shikuku & Janneke Pieters & Erwin Bulte & Peter Läderach, 2019. "Incentives and the Diffusion of Agricultural Knowledge: Experimental Evidence from Northern Uganda," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1164-1180.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:101:y:2019:i:4:p:1164-1180.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aaz010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:101:y:2019:i:4:p:1164-1180.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.