IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/eecytt/v2y2013p158-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of socio-cultural attitudes and entrepreneurial activities between regions in Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Nerma Saracevic
  • Katarina Stavlic

    (University of Applied Sciences in Pozega)

  • Ljiljana Kukec
  • Drago Cepanec

    (VERN University of Applied Sciences in Zagreb)

Abstract

This paper analyses the results of the comparison of different socio-cultural attitudes and attitudes about entrepreneurial activities between regions in Croatia. Three hypothesis tested in this research are related to six regions in Croatia. One of the regions is the region of Slavonia and Baranja. Data source for this research was the GEM research (Global entrepreneurship monitor) because entrepreneurial development in some region or country depends on a lot of factors which are very well explained in the Conceptual frame of GEM research. With this research it is proved that the indicators of entrepreneurial activity do no differ on regional level in Croatia ,that there are significant differences in attitudes that depend on socio cultural matters between the regions in Croatia and that there are differences in perception and the fear of failure toward entrepreneurial activity between regions in Croatia.

Suggested Citation

  • Nerma Saracevic & Katarina Stavlic & Ljiljana Kukec & Drago Cepanec, 2013. "A comparison of socio-cultural attitudes and entrepreneurial activities between regions in Croatia," Economy of eastern Croatia yesterday, today, tommorow, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 2, pages 158-169.
    • Handle: RePEc:osi:eecytt:v:2:y:2013:p:158-169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.unios.hr/repec/osi/eecytt/PDF/EconomyofeasternCroatiayesterdaytodaytomorrow02/eecytt0218.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:eecytt:v:2:y:2013:p:158-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hrvoje Serdarusic, PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.