IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/eecytt/v1y2012p318-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Croatian regional differences in health related quality of life in relation to self perceived economic status

Author

Listed:
  • Gorka Vuletic

    (Faculty of Philosophy)

  • Daniela Sincek

    (Faculty of Philosophy)

  • Nikola Kraljik

    (Institute of Public Health Osijek-Baranja County)

  • Daria Vuger-Kovacic

    (Special hospital for rehabilitation Varazdinske Toplice)

Abstract

While much health research focuses on objective outcome measures, such as morbidity or mortality defined through clinical assessment, there is an increasing emphasis on self-reported measures of health status and health-related quality of life. Their use reflects the importance of considering the people’s point of view and the multidimensional nature of health. Following the recognition of the individual’s own perception as a useful indicator of general health status, self-perceived health has become one of the most significant population health indicators studied today. From a public health perspective, such monitoring aids the identification of population inequalities in health status, potentially reveals unmet needs in the community, and indicates important health-promoting efforts. Numerous studies have shown significant relationship between self-perceived health and objective measures of health (morbidity and mortality). Poorer health is related to higher morbidity and mortality and secondary to lower everyday functionality of those people (population). Since chronic diseases and conditions became part of the everyday life for the large proportion of our population it is considerable to research the subjective quality of life (QoL) of those people. It is known that health is one of the significant factors that influence person’s QoL, and someone’s own perception of satisfaction with life needs to be recognized as valuable indicator of population health (especially mental health).Furthermore, low socio-economic status was correlated with subjective health and has implications on everyday functioning and working productivity of the individuals.In this study the regional differences in health and quality of life was examined in the sample of 9070 adult participants from all region of Croatia. East Croatia region was compared to other regions. Health was measured by SF-36 health status questionnaire covering eight dimensions of health separated in two area of health: Physical functioning, Role limitation due to physical problems, Bodily pain and General health perception which appertains to concept of physical health and dimensions of Social functioning, Role limitation due to emotional problems, Mental health, Energy and Vitality which appertains to concept of mental health. Results have revealed significant regional difference in health with the significantly poorer health in East Croatian region in comparison with other regions. Health status was significantly correlated with self-assessed socio-economic status where is also the worst situation in East region (low level of both health and economic status). Taking in account that self perceived health has influence on person's everyday functioning, work ability and efficacy this results stress the importance of promoting biological, psychological and economical factors of health. Multidisciplinarity is a key approach in achieving this goal.

Suggested Citation

  • Gorka Vuletic & Daniela Sincek & Nikola Kraljik & Daria Vuger-Kovacic, 2012. "Croatian regional differences in health related quality of life in relation to self perceived economic status," Economy of eastern Croatia yesterday, today, tommorow, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 1, pages 318-324.
  • Handle: RePEc:osi:eecytt:v:1:y:2012:p:318-324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.unios.hr/repec/osi/eecytt/PDF/EconomyofeasternCroatiayesterdaytodaytomorrow01/eecytt0136.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:eecytt:v:1:y:2012:p:318-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hrvoje Serdarusic, PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.