IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/bulimm/v18y2018p369-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Criteria Establishment For Evaluation Of County And Local Public Ports Management System

Author

Listed:
  • Borna Debelic

    (University of Rijeka, Faculty of Maritime Studies)

  • Neven Grubisic

    (University of Rijeka, Faculty of Maritime Studies)

  • Alen Jugovic

    (University of Rijeka, Faculty of Maritime Studies)

Abstract

This paper aims to establish criteria appropriate for evaluation of county and local public ports management system in the process of selection of an appropriate management system for different port authorities within coherent national port governance system. Different functional development directions of county and local public ports are defined together with four different development directions on the field correlated with four analysed groups of end users. Four main groups of criteria (economic and financial, functionality, prioritization, successfulness) are developed encompassing 10 different criteria in total. The accent is given to successful fulfilment of county and local port services while in the same time achieving wider direct and indirect economic and social effects. The importance of adequate modelling and selection of optimal model for management of county and local public ports is emphasized together with the necessity to adequately evaluate effects of possible development models and directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Borna Debelic & Neven Grubisic & Alen Jugovic, 2018. "Criteria Establishment For Evaluation Of County And Local Public Ports Management System," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 369-388.
    • Handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:18:y:2018:p:369-388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.unios.hr/repec/osi/bulimm/PDF/BusinessLogisticsinModernManagement18/blimm1822.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:18:y:2018:p:369-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Davor Dujak,PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.