IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/jrojbe/v6y2021i2p98-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Entrepreneurial Dynamics Influence Economic Growth And Employment? Evidence For Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Ramona Simut

    (Department of Economic and Business and Doctoral School of Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Alina Badulescu

    (Department of Economic and Business and Doctoral School of Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Dragos Dianu

    (Doctoral School of Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

The literature on the relationship between entrepreneurship, firm formation and economic development often describes entrepreneurship as a complex phenomenon, led by individuals, embedded in a broad economic and societal context, which, in regional terms, influences the quality and results of the entrepreneurial process. From a micro-economic perspective, the region is shaped by the myriad of laborious and innovative actions of entrepreneurs, looking for opportunities, taking risks, starting businesses and generating economic and social associations. Competition, trust, networks, mentalities, the education system, public policies, all are ingredients that can provide opportunities for many actors at the local level (institutions, businesses, population, etc.) and thus, for the region as a whole to thrive. Often these elements can offer the opportunities of economic convergence between regions and countries. On the other hand, we found that the potential of entrepreneurship to generate benefits and an impetus for the economic growth of regions were not fully researched and understood, despite suggestive empirical evidence and a rich literature in regional studies. In this article we analysed, at the level of the 8 development regions of Romania, the relation between the firm’s formation and the evolution of the main macroeconomic indicators (i.e. Gross Domestic Product and employment/active population). We did not find clear evidence that the pace of setting up new businesses has a certain effect on economic growth or employment, but we found that in some regions, better equipped in terms of infrastructure, qualification and diversity of human capital, entrepreneurial dynamics could moderately influence the positive evolution of these macroeconomic indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramona Simut & Alina Badulescu & Dragos Dianu, 2021. "Do Entrepreneurial Dynamics Influence Economic Growth And Employment? Evidence For Romania," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 98-110, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:6:y:2021:i:2:p:98-110
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ojbe.steconomiceuoradea.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/OJBE-62-98-110.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    : firm’s formation; discontinuity; GDP; active population; Romania; development regions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:6:y:2021:i:2:p:98-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomina SAVEANU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.