IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2010i1p585-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Background Of Professional Judgment Of Materialty In Statutory Audit Based On Qualitative Factors Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Span Georgeta Ancuta
  • Popa Irimie Emil
  • Fulop Melinda Timea
  • Pop Atanasiu

Abstract

The assessment of a significant ascertainment made by the auditor is particularly sensitive which shapes the quality of a mission as a whole. Materiality plays a primary role in determining the relevance of information provided by the users of financial statements. This material highlights the role of qualitative factors in determining materiality, as far as many practitioners are accustomed to consider this item only in terms of quantitative factors. Although legislation does not set precise rules in determining materiality, the issue is necessary because decisions of the auditors and users of audited information hang on this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Span Georgeta Ancuta & Popa Irimie Emil & Fulop Melinda Timea & Pop Atanasiu, 2010. "The Background Of Professional Judgment Of Materialty In Statutory Audit Based On Qualitative Factors Analysis," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 585-588, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2010:i:1:p:585-588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2010/n1/091.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    materiality; qualitative factors; professional judgment; financial statements;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2010:i:1:p:585-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.