IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/ijebms/v13y2026i1p83-101id1818.html

SDG disclosure in the mining sector: Trends, regional differences, and sub-industry variation

Author

Listed:
  • Evgenia Anagnostopoulou

Abstract

This study investigates the disclosure of alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by mining firms and assesses whether disclosure patterns differ over time, across regions, and among sub-industries. Drawing on 3,048 firm-year observations from global mining companies between 2019 and 2024, the analysis maps references to all 17 SDGs across seven mining sub-industries. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, two-way ANOVA, and correlation analysis are employed to identify patterns of SDG adoption and their association with selected firm characteristics. The results indicate that SDG disclosure in the mining sector is selective rather than comprehensive. SDG 8, SDG 13, SDG 3, and SDG 12 are most frequently referenced, while SDG 2 and SDG 14 are comparatively marginal. The most prominent trend is a substantial increase in SDG disclosure over time, reflecting the widespread adoption of SDG-related reporting across the sector. Although regional and sub-industry differences are present, they are generally less pronounced than the temporal trend. Significant interaction effects between region and sub-industry suggest that disclosure patterns are shaped by both institutional context and mining specialization. Larger firms are more likely to disclose a broader SDG profile. These findings provide evidence to help policymakers and managers benchmark disclosure practices and enhance the quality and comparability of SDG-related reporting in the mining sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgenia Anagnostopoulou, 2026. "SDG disclosure in the mining sector: Trends, regional differences, and sub-industry variation," International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies, Online Science Publishing, vol. 13(1), pages 83-101.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:ijebms:v:13:y:2026:i:1:p:83-101:id:1818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ijebms/article/view/1818/1754
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:ijebms:v:13:y:2026:i:1:p:83-101:id:1818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Pacharapa Naka to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ijebms/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.