IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/gjosss/v2y2016i3p150-164id499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Contrastive Analysis of the Segmental Phonological Features of English and Twi (ʧwi)

Author

Listed:
  • BELLO, Yekeen

Abstract

This study attempted a Contrastive Analysis study of English language and Twi /ʧwi/ sound systems i.e. the segmental phonological features, with a view to finding out areas of similarities and differences in order to be acquainted with the possible areas of ease and difficulty for Ashanti learners of English as a second language. Findings showed that areas of similarities would not pose any problem for Ashanti learners of English while areas of differences would pose problems in English as a second language. Based on the findings and the conclusion, it was recommended that teachers of English should be aware of the need to concentrate more on speech training, speak, and in turn encourage their students to often speak English, as well as carrying out exercises on error analysis. Similarly, students are advised to cultivate the habit of good listening and speaking habits. They should also listen to both local and international news such as on the British Broadcasting Cooperation (BBC), Voice of America (VOA), among others with a view to making comparative analysis among them. It was also recommended that government should make oral English compulsory at all levels of academic institutions, among other recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • BELLO, Yekeen, 2016. "A Contrastive Analysis of the Segmental Phonological Features of English and Twi (ʧwi)," Global Journal of Social Sciences Studies, Online Science Publishing, vol. 2(3), pages 150-164.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:gjosss:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:150-164:id:499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/gjss/article/view/499/777
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:gjosss:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:150-164:id:499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/gjss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.