IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/gjosss/v2y2016i2p104-111id495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk and Return: Comparative Study of Active Sukuk Markets of Nasdaq Hsbc Amanah Sukuk and Nasdaq Dubai Listed Sukuk

Author

Listed:
  • Ahamed Lebbe Abdul Rauf

Abstract

This study attempted to identify the different types of risk embedded in the sukuk structure of Nasdaq HSBC Amanah sukuk and Nasdaq Dubai listed sukuk. Data were collected from seven groups of the sukuk market from 2005 to 2015 on a periodic monthly basis. Collected secondary data were undergone descriptive, correlation and multiple regression analysis. The results revealed that Nasdaq HSBC Amanah sukuk and Nasdaq Dubai listed sukuk assured that two models explain 61% to 72% of the variation. While Nasdaq HSBC Amanah sukuk return is 61% exposed to risk, Nasdaq Dubai listed sukuk return is 72% exposed to risk. F statistics shown that the models are significant at the 5% level and all models are acceptable. Analysis of results on the basis of special sectorial indicated that when Nasdaq HSBC Amanah sukuk is compared with Nasdaq Dubai listed sukuk, the risk impact is higher in Nasdaq Dubai listed sukuk. The test results confirmed the significant influence of market risk, credit risk, operational risk and liquidity risk on the sukuk returns in different ways.This study recommends that conducive environment should be given to promote secondary markets for sukuk. In addition to that Government regulators and policy makers should pay attention on these issues periodically. As such sukuk market can be more active.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahamed Lebbe Abdul Rauf, 2016. "Risk and Return: Comparative Study of Active Sukuk Markets of Nasdaq Hsbc Amanah Sukuk and Nasdaq Dubai Listed Sukuk," Global Journal of Social Sciences Studies, Online Science Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 104-111.
    • Handle: RePEc:onl:gjosss:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:104-111:id:495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/gjss/article/view/495/773
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:gjosss:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:104-111:id:495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/gjss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.