IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/amjoce/v3y2020i1p32-41id348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Survey on the Degree of Satisfaction of Teaching Skill Learning of Mathematics Normal Students in Post Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Li
  • Zezhong Yang

Abstract

The post-practice of normal students is a popular practice mode at present. Teaching skill is the main content that normal students learn in practice. In order to promote the better development of post-practice, this study selected some interns of the post-practice of mathematics major in a Normal University in China and investigated the satisfaction of learning. The results show that mathematics normal students are satisfied with the learning of the teaching skills of four dimensions, which shows that they are generally satisfied with the post-practice, and their satisfaction is relatively high. However, the learning of some of the teaching skills has low scores, indicating that mathematics normal students are not very satisfied with the learning of these teaching skills and need to improve. Therefore, it is suggested that in the process of post-practice, colleges and guidance teachers should pay attention to strengthening the guidance of weak teaching skills such as writing teaching plans, so as to promote the better development of normal students.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Li & Zezhong Yang, 2020. "A Survey on the Degree of Satisfaction of Teaching Skill Learning of Mathematics Normal Students in Post Practice," American Journal of Creative Education, Online Science Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 32-41.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:amjoce:v:3:y:2020:i:1:p:32-41:id:348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajce/article/view/348/521
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajce/article/view/348/973
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:amjoce:v:3:y:2020:i:1:p:32-41:id:348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajce/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.