IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/ajossh/v4y2019i3p418-433id152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perception of Female Saudi English Students of the Relative Value of Giving Feedback on Academic Writing through Conferencing

Author

Listed:
  • Wafa’a Mueed Alrezqi
  • Abeer Sultan Althaqafi

Abstract

The present study focuses on feedback-based writing conferences that involve feedback sessions with the teacher in a more dialogic and collaborative atmosphere to respond to students' writing. The rationale behind eliciting students’ views and preferences regarding one-on-one and group FBWCs stems from the importance of fostering effective collaboration between students and their teachers using the learners’ preferred approaches of critical and constructive discussions. Three research questions were developed to guide the mixed methods study, which focused on students’ perceptions, their preferences concerning individual or group FBWCs, and their suggestions for better implementation of FBWCs in foundational academic writing courses. The study’s participants were 77 first-year female students majoring in English. All the students responded to an online survey, and nine of them voluntarily participated in semi-structured interviews. Statistical analyses of quantitative data were performed by SPSS, using a descriptive analysis approach in addition to using paired t tests. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyse qualitative data. Findings revealed students’ positive views about the usefulness of FBWCs for their academic writing development. The students’ responses indicated no significant differences between their preferences for individual or group FBWCs; however, students emphasized their needs for adequate and meaningful feedback in collaborative and motivating environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Wafa’a Mueed Alrezqi & Abeer Sultan Althaqafi, 2019. "The Perception of Female Saudi English Students of the Relative Value of Giving Feedback on Academic Writing through Conferencing," American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Online Science Publishing, vol. 4(3), pages 418-433.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:ajossh:v:4:y:2019:i:3:p:418-433:id:152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajssh/article/view/152/195
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajssh/article/view/152/1025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:ajossh:v:4:y:2019:i:3:p:418-433:id:152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajssh/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.