IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/ajossh/v4y2019i1p118-128id126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Gendered and Occupational Status Nature of Workplace Bullying

Author

Listed:
  • Fapohunda, Tinuke. M.

Abstract

The study explored gender and occupational status dissimilarities in the experience of workplace bullying. Data from 327 workers in four different ministries in the Lagos State Public Service in Nigeria was gathered through a questionnaire. The MDM Questionnaire developed by Merecz-Kot and Cębrzyńska (2008) was adopted. The value of Cronbachα coefficient was 0.876. The Chi-Square Test and the two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were employed for analyses. Altogether, the results exemplify gender disparities both in the occurrence, rates and types of workplace bullying, and also that gender is vital in how targets and third parties understand and react to bullying. 70% of the female respondents as opposed to 49% of the male respondents reported having experienced bullying at work. This disparity was statistically significant. Again, 56% of the female victims reported being bullied by another female in the workplace while 41% were bullied by a male. For 60% of the female victims, their bullies were individuals with authority over them like managers and supervisors. While 20% were identified as co-workers of higher rankings, 16% were bullied by co-workers of the same ranking, and 4% were bullied by co-workers of lower rankings. The results substantiate the central position of gender disparities in predicting workplace bullying and sustain the outlook that gender is not simply a personal precursor of bullying, but instead serves as a social feature that manipulates the occurrence of workplace bullying. Since most victims are women, bullying becomes an instrument for sustaining gender inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Fapohunda, Tinuke. M., 2019. "The Gendered and Occupational Status Nature of Workplace Bullying," American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Online Science Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 118-128.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:ajossh:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:118-128:id:126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajssh/article/view/126/145
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajssh/article/view/126/1001
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:ajossh:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:118-128:id:126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajssh/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.