IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbbu/y2025iq4-25-3b3.html

EU–Mercosur deal: a subtle tradeoff in growth, emissions and global cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Abeliansky

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank)

  • Andreas Breitenfellner

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank)

  • Nađa Džubur

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank)

Abstract

Negotiations on the trade agreement between the EU and Mercosur were concluded in 2024, though ratification is still pending. Some EU countries remain opposed to the agreement, primarily due to agricultural and environmental concerns. Using Oxford Economics’ Global Economic Model (GEM), we simulate the impact of a general trade shock resembling the agreement's estimated outcome. Our results show the impact on trade, GDP, inflation, employment and greenhouse gas emissions in the EU-27, Austria and the three largest Mercosur countries after the agreement’s implementation in the post-adjustment phase in 2040. The EU and Mercosur would both see rising trade, though Mercosur's increase would be ten times larger in relative terms. Similarly, after 15 years, annual GDP gains are expected to be modest in the EU (0.02%) and slightly stronger in Mercosur (0.06%). The environmental impact is projected to be relatively more pronounced: greenhouse gas emissions in 2040 could increase by 0.1% in the EU and by 0.8% in Mercosur. While these findings are within the range of (but somewhat lower than) those of prior studies, they should be interpreted with caution, given the model’s limitations. Despite environmental concerns, the agreement could signal a commitment to global cooperation and ensure the EU’s access to essential raw materials for the green transition. In return, Mercosur countries would receive financial support for their green and digital transformations, strengthening sustainability standards and efforts against deforestation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Abeliansky & Andreas Breitenfellner & Nađa Džubur, 2025. "EU–Mercosur deal: a subtle tradeoff in growth, emissions and global cooperation," OeNB Bulletin, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q4/25-3, pages 1-24.
  • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbbu:y:2025:i:q4/25-3:b:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:6e146b3b-f077-4502-9665-2adbe8e14afc/oenb-bulletin-q4-25-eu-mercosur-deal.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. & Feng, Michael, 2014. "Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 339-350.
    2. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H., 2007. "Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 72-95, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernard Hoekman & Anirudh Shingal, 2020. "Aid for trade and international transactions in goods and services," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 320-340, May.
    2. Christian Elleby & Wusheng Yu & Qian Yu, 2018. "The Chinese Export Displacement Effect Revisited," IFRO Working Paper 2018/02, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    3. Hassan, Ramin & Loualiche, Erik & Pecora, Alexandre R. & Ward, Colin, 2023. "International trade and the risk in bilateral exchange rates," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(2).
    4. Claudio Candia Campano & Medardo Aguirre Gonz�lez & Lilliam Ant�n L�pez & Javier Beltr�n Valdebenito, 2018. "A gravity model of trade for Nicaraguan agricultural exports," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 37(74), pages 391-428.
    5. Yilmazkuday, Hakan, 2019. "Estimating the trade elasticity over time," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Swati Dhingra & Rebecca Freeman & Hanwei Huang, 2023. "The Impact of Non‐tariff Barriers on Trade and Welfare," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(357), pages 140-177, January.
    7. Alessandria, George & Choi, Horag & Ruhl, Kim J., 2021. "Trade adjustment dynamics and the welfare gains from trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Katharina Längle, 2020. "Upgrading of Exports: Does the Integration into Trade Agreements Pave the Way to Product Upgrading?," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 20006, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    9. Carl Gaigné & Lota D. Tamini, 2021. "Environmental Taxation and Import Demand for Environmental Goods: Theory and Evidence from the European Union," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(2), pages 307-352, February.
    10. Scott L. Baier & Narendra R. Regmi, 2023. "Using Machine Learning to Capture Heterogeneity in Trade Agreements," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 863-894, September.
    11. Juyoung Cheong & Do Won Kwak & Kam Ki Tang, 2015. "Can Trade Agreements Curtail Trade Creation and Prevent Trade Diversion?," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 221-238, May.
    12. Zi Hui Yin & Chang Hwan Choi, 2025. "How does Digitalization Affect Trade in Goods and Services? Evidence from G20 Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 3614-3638, March.
    13. Emiliano Magrini & Pierluigi Montalbano & Silvia Nenci, 2013. "Are the EU trade preferences really effective? A Generalized Propensity Score evaluation of the Southern Mediterranean Countries' case in agriculture and fishery," Working Papers 2/13, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    14. Aaditya Mattoo & Alen Mulabdic & Michele Ruta, 2022. "Trade creation and trade diversion in deep agreements," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 1598-1637, August.
    15. Aichele, Rahel & Heiland, Inga, 2018. "Where is the value added? Trade liberalization and production networks," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 130-144.
    16. George Alessandria & Oscar Avila, 2023. "Trade Integration, Industry Reallocation, and Welfare in Colombia," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 71(3), pages 649-687, September.
    17. Harald Oberhofer & Zhenyi Wang, 2025. "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About EU Membership Trade Effects But Were Afraid to Ask," CESifo Working Paper Series 11823, CESifo.
    18. Norikatsu Hiraide & Leilei Shen & Peri Silva, 2020. "The importance of heterogeneity in determining the effects of preferential trade agreements on Foreign Direct Investment," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 3262-3295, December.
    19. Weidner, Martin & Zylkin, Thomas, 2021. "Bias and consistency in three-way gravity models," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    20. Swati Dhingra & Rebecca Freeman & Eleonora Mavroeidi, 2018. "Beyond tariff reductions: what extra boost from trade agreement provisions?," CEP Discussion Papers dp1532, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F17 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Forecasting and Simulation
    • F18 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Environment
    • F62 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Macroeconomic Impacts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbbu:y:2025:i:q4/25-3:b:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alisa Besirevic-Abdagic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.