IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/neakab/5k40d5w3fhjk.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La « protection suffisante » après Fukushima : L'élément stabled'un monde changeant

Author

Listed:
  • William C. Ostendorff
  • Kimberly A. Sexton

Abstract

L’accident tragique survenu à la centrale nucléaire de Fukushima Daiichi restera longtemps l’un des événements marquants de l’histoire de l’exploitation commerciale de l’énergie nucléaire. Aux États-Unis, la Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) n’avait pas été confrontée à tant de questions importantes, touchant au coeur même de sa mission, depuis l’accident de Three Mile Island en 1979. Comme sa priorité a été, à juste titre, d’évaluer les mérites techniques des recommandations énoncées dans le rapport de sa Near-Term Task Force (NTTF)1, elle n’a pas accordé autant d’attention aux répercussions réglementaires à long terme de ses actions post-Fukushima. Maintenant qu’il s’est écoulé suffisamment de temps, il me semble utile de prendre le maximum de recul possible pour évaluer l’incidence que la mise en oeuvre de toutes ces actions aura sur notre cadre réglementaire et sur notre approche de la « protection suffisante ».

Suggested Citation

  • William C. Ostendorff & Kimberly A. Sexton, 2013. "La « protection suffisante » après Fukushima : L'élément stabled'un monde changeant," Bulletin de droit nucléaire, Éditions OCDE, vol. 2013(1), pages 27-48.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:neakab:5k40d5w3fhjk
    DOI: 10.1787/nuclear_law-2013-5k40d5w3fhjk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/nuclear_law-2013-5k40d5w3fhjk
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/nuclear_law-2013-5k40d5w3fhjk?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:neakab:5k40d5w3fhjk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.