IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/dcdkaa/5kz990fw74nw.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Challenge of Capacity Development: Working Towards Good Practice

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

This report draws on four decades of documented experience provided by both bilateral and multilateral donors, as well as academic specialists, to help policy makers and practitioners think through effective approaches to capacity development and what challenges remain in the drive to boost country capacity. The analysis is underpinned by a conceptual framework which guides practitioners to view capacity development at three interrelated levels: individual, organisational and the enabling environment. It provides insights into what capacity development is, why it matters and, more importantly, what can be done to support it.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2008. "The Challenge of Capacity Development: Working Towards Good Practice," OECD Journal on Development, OECD Publishing, vol. 8(3), pages 233-276.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:dcdkaa:5kz990fw74nw
    DOI: 10.1787/journal_dev-v8-art40-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/journal_dev-v8-art40-en
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/journal_dev-v8-art40-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matuku Mphahlele & Horacio Zandamela, 2021. "Local Government Capacity Development: A Case Study of a South African District Municipality," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 156177-1561, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:dcdkaa:5kz990fw74nw. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.