IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oap/ijaefa/v24y2026i1p16-29id2467.html

COVID-19 Impact: A comparative analysis of social traders vs. Traditional fund managers

Author

Listed:
  • Zdravko Tretinjak

Abstract

This study examines the performance and risk characteristics of social traders on the Wikifolio platform compared with traditional fund managers across three market regimes: the pre-COVID period (2018–2019), the COVID-19 crisis year (2020), and the post-COVID period (2021–2022). Using historical daily price data from 67 Wikifolios and 67 traditional investment funds, a range of performance and risk measures, including the Sharpe Ratio, Sortino Ratio, Jensen’s Alpha, Beta, and Value at Risk, were analyzed. The results reveal significant differences between social traders and traditional fund managers prior to the COVID-19 crisis. During the pandemic, however, these differences diminished considerably, and no statistically significant differences were observed in the post-pandemic period. The findings suggest a gradual convergence of performance and risk characteristics between decentralized social trading and professional portfolio management under conditions of severe market stress. These results contribute to the growing literature on social trading by demonstrating that social traders can achieve outcomes comparable to professional fund managers during and after major market disruptions. The findings further indicate that social trading platforms may represent a viable complement to traditional investment products within diversified investment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zdravko Tretinjak, 2026. "COVID-19 Impact: A comparative analysis of social traders vs. Traditional fund managers," International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Online Academic Press, vol. 24(1), pages 16-29.
  • Handle: RePEc:oap:ijaefa:v:24:y:2026:i:1:p:16-29:id:2467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJAEFA/article/view/2467/1175
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oap:ijaefa:v:24:y:2026:i:1:p:16-29:id:2467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Heather Rothman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJAEFA/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.