IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oap/ijaefa/v17y2023i2p529-552id1232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative scientometric analysis of investor sentiment and trading behaviour research

Author

Listed:
  • Kezhen Zhang
  • Normaziah Mohd Nor
  • Aslam Izah Selamat

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of investor sentiment and trading behavior in the field of behavioral finance. This study analyzes and compares the research evolution within these two domains using various scientometric analysis methods. The analysis reveals that the number of publications in the field of investor sentiment has grown exponentially while research activity in trading behavior has slowed down in recent years. Investor sentiment research has attracted more attention and generated more publications despite a relatively late start. The USA and China are the major countries conducting research in these two fields and the research output is primarily derived from economically developed regions. Investor sentiment and trading behavior research shows a convergence trend with common research hotspots including COVID-19, Bitcoin and machine learning. Both fields are concentrated in financial market research and have emerging research frontiers such as financial crises, social media and cryptocurrencies. Highly cited articles indicate a degree of overlap between the two fields wherein the domain of trading behavior is predominantly linked to investor sentiment. This study provides valuable insights into the research progress on investor sentiment and trading behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Kezhen Zhang & Normaziah Mohd Nor & Aslam Izah Selamat, 2023. "A comparative scientometric analysis of investor sentiment and trading behaviour research," International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Online Academic Press, vol. 17(2), pages 529-552.
  • Handle: RePEc:oap:ijaefa:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:529-552:id:1232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJAEFA/article/view/1232/809
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJAEFA/article/view/1232/948
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oap:ijaefa:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:529-552:id:1232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Heather Rothman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJAEFA/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.