IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nye/nyervw/v40y2009i1p51-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Appraisal and Football Point Spreads: A Note

Author

Listed:
  • Ladd Kochman
  • Ken Gilliam

Abstract

Football point spreads were designed to divide the betting public in half and turn transaction costs into risk-free returns for gambling operators. Invariably, one team will be better than its opponent and, in the absence of a point spread, would naturally be the bettors' choice. By awarding a skillfully devised number of points to the inferior team (or underdog), the superior team (or favorite) becomes less attractive to bettors and, in theory, is then picked to "win" by roughly half of the bettors. Since point spreads -- like security prices -- adjust for all available information, regular betting profits would be a bona fide exception to the efficient market hypothesis.The performance of football coaches can be appraised by their success against the point spread. If the football betting market is as efficient as researchers have generally reported, no team should experience abnormal success or failure against the spread. The purpose of this study is to appraise the performance of college football coaches in the absence of any advantages which their programs may afford them. To accomplish that goal, we investigated the performance of college football coaches with minimum tenures of seven years at their respective schools against the point spread for the 2001-2007 seasons.

Suggested Citation

  • Ladd Kochman & Ken Gilliam, 2009. "Performance Appraisal and Football Point Spreads: A Note," New York Economic Review, New York State Economics Association (NYSEA), pages 51-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:nye:nyervw:v:40:y:2009:i:1:p:51-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nyecon.net/nysea/publications/nyer/2009/NYER_2009_p051.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.nyecon.net/nysea/publications/nyer/2009/NYER_2009_p051.html
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellen Sewell, 2004. "Grade Dropping: An Empirical Analysis," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, pages 24-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nye:nyervw:v:40:y:2009:i:1:p:51-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eryk Wdowiak). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/nyseaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.