Unemployment Index: A Multidimensional Measure of Labor Market Efficiency
The unemployment rate, which is measured by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as the proportion of labor force participants who are classified as being unemployed, is a traditional statistic that is used to evaluate labor market conditions. This conventional measure of unemployment considers incidence of unemployment and is a one-dimensional view of the unemployment experience. This analysis develops an alternative measure for evaluating labor market conditions that incorporates duration of unemployment. By aggregating the time that an individual is unemployed across the labor force, a measure of the gap between actual weeks of labor and potential weeks of labor is created. This ratio is then decomposed into familiar components of unemployment, incidence and duration. Incidence refers to the likelihood of experiencing unemployment and duration refers to the length of time spent unemployed. This framework provides a basis for creating an "unemployment index" in which the different components of unemployment are highlighted and used together as an indicator of labor market efficiency. Such an index can be useful for policy purposes when both incidence and duration are relevant in assessing economic conditions as well as in comparing the unemployment experience between different groups, identified by gender, race, age, state/regional residence, industry classification, or occupational classification.
Volume (Year): 39 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://sites.google.com/site/econnysea/|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Baker, Michael, 1992. "Unemployment Duration: Compositional Effects and Cyclical Variability," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(1), pages 313-321, March.
- Toshihiko Mukoyama & Aysegul Sahin, 2004.
"Why Did the Average Duration of Unemployment Become So Much Longer?,"
04002, Concordia University, Department of Economics.
- Mukoyama, Toshihiko & Sahin, Aysegl, 2009. "Why did the average duration of unemployment become so much longer?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 200-209, March.
- Toshihiko Mukoyama & Aysegül Sahin, 2004. "Why did the average duration of unemployment become so much longer?," Staff Reports 194, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
- Robert G. Valletta, 2002. "Recent trends in unemployment duration," FRBSF Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue nov22.
- repec:uwp:jhriss:v:9:y:1974:i:4:p:452-464 is not listed on IDEAS
- Robert G. Valletta, 1998. "Changes in the structure and duration of U.S. unemployment, 1967-1998," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pages 29-40.
- Larry DeBoer & Michael C. Seeborg, 1989. "The Unemployment Rates of Men and Women: A Transition Probability Analysis," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 42(3), pages 404-414, April.
- Richard B. Freeman & David A. Wise, 1982.
"The Youth Labor Market Problem: Its Nature, Causes, and Consequences,"
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number free82-1.
- Richard B. Freeman & David A. Wise, 1982. "The Youth Labor Market Problem: Its Nature Causes and Consequences," NBER Chapters, in: The Youth Labor Market Problem: Its Nature, Causes, and Consequences, pages 1-16 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Erica L. Groshen & Simon M. Potter, 2003. "Has structural change contributed to a jobless recovery?," Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 9(Aug).
- Lisa Barrow, 2004. "Is the official unemployment rate misleading? a look at labor market statistics over the business cycle," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, issue Q II, pages 21-35.
- Robert G. Valletta, 2003. "Extended unemployment in California," FRBSF Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue feb28.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nye:nyervw:v:39:y:2008:i:1:p:44-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eryk Wdowiak)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.