IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

A Corner Solution: Commodity Futures, Default Fines, and Unintended Consequences

  • Wojtek Sikorzewski
Registered author(s):

    We analyze one specific form of market manipulation - corners (or squeezes) in some commodity futures markets. In the analysis we focus on the role of institutional factors such as the storage capacity at the delivery point and the severity of fines imposed on defaulting shorts. We analyze the influence of these factors on the likelihood that a corner-style manipulation might occur.A reduction in storage capacity or an increase in the amount of fines imposed on defaulting shorts increases the probability of the occurrence. However, the latter factor seems quiet paradoxical. A high level of fines in case of default on a futures contract should decrease the number of defaults and thus make a futures contract more reliable. But, it tends to make the corners more frequent and thus makes the futures contracts less useful for the hedgers.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://nysea.bizland.com/nysea/publications/nyer/2002/NYER_2002_p003.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://nysea.bizland.com/nysea/publications/nyer/2002/NYER_2002_p003.html
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by New York State Economics Association (NYSEA) in its journal New York Economic Review.

    Volume (Year): 33 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 3-16

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:nye:nyervw:v:33:y:2002:i:1:p:3-16
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://nysea.bizland.com/

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nye:nyervw:v:33:y:2002:i:1:p:3-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eryk Wdowiak)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.