IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/natrud/y2025i3p39-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Globalization Study of the Regulation Framework in Artificial Intelligence of the United States, China and the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Danko Tonev

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

The study attempts to assess institutional change from technological globalization and the development of artificial intelligence. For this purpose, a brief comparative study is used of the existing market development and regulatory framework in the three leading global economies – the United States, China and the European Union. The research results show significant differences in market-oriented competitive policies of government vis-a-vis local companies and global competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Danko Tonev, 2025. "A Comparative Globalization Study of the Regulation Framework in Artificial Intelligence of the United States, China and the European Union," Nauchni trudove, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 39-51, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2025:i:3:p:39-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://unwe-research-papers.org/bg/journalissues/article/11715
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • P52 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Studies of Particular Economies
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2025:i:3:p:39-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.