IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/natrud/y2017i3p69-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Debate in Academic Teaching of Political Economy and jhe Economical Pluralism in Modern France

Author

Listed:
  • Margarita Borisova

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

This study is dedicated to the contemporary debate on the teaching of political economy in France as part of a multi-dimensional process of realization of the idea for a Renaissance of political economy in Bulgaria, France and in the entire world. Based on the analysis of economic thought in France from the beginning of the 19th century until the beginning of 21st century distinguish institutional place of education systems in the teaching of political economy, as well as the role of the political economists, economists, engineers and technocrats. The main task of this study was to trace the French experience and directions of development in political economy. For this purpose we present our first study, for teaching the discipline at leading educational establishments in France and second in scientific and research centers, institutes, companies, associations, magazines and etc. We share to a large extent the concerns about the absence of pluralism and ,,control" over the economic thinking in France and expresses support for studies of the latest global trends in the development of the political economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Margarita Borisova, 2017. "The Debate in Academic Teaching of Political Economy and jhe Economical Pluralism in Modern France," Nauchni trudove, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 69-86, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2017:i:3:p:69-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://unwe-research-papers.org/bg/journalissues/article/9922
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    political economy; pluralism; debate;

    JEL classification:

    • B - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2017:i:3:p:69-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vanya Lazarova). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.