IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/natrud/y2014i3p103-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bulgarian Transition and the Way of Destabilization of Constitutionalism

Author

Listed:
  • Elka Todorova

    () (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Miroslav Popov

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Bulgarian state is in crisis, the main reason for that is the lack of analysis of the actual state of constitutionalism and anti-constitutionalism. Over the past quarter century, a number of state institutions did not meet fully their constitutional obligations towards the citizens and the state as a whole: a) the state abdicated from the defense of a number of constitutionally enshrined rights of citizens; b) a condescending attitude has been imposed to the new constitution, while its fundamental principles are interpreted and developed in the current legislation in a way different from the actual meaning of the constitutional norms; c) fundamental to the modern parliamentary practices issues are problematized; d) main elements of the democratic society are disclaimed. Instead of providing examination and analytical assessment of the Bulgarian judiciary law enforcement nihilism takes place. The war against the Bulgarian statehood has many motives, the main being economic interests and incompetence.

Suggested Citation

  • Elka Todorova & Miroslav Popov, 2014. "Bulgarian Transition and the Way of Destabilization of Constitutionalism," Nauchni trudove, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 103-126, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2014:i:3:p:103-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://research.unwe.bg/uploads/ResearchPapers/Research%20Papers_vol3_2014_No3_E%20Todorova,%20M%20Popov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    constitution; constitutionalism; anti-constitutionalism; parliamentarism; judiciary; judicial norms; judicial practices.;

    JEL classification:

    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2014:i:3:p:103-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vanya Lazarova). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.