Anti-corruption Criteria for Quality Evaluation of the Activities of the Judiciary System

One of the basic principles of democracy is the liability of any individual for their actions, omissions, decisions and damage, especially if they are paid for it by the state budget. Changing the constitution is just one tiny part of the chain, which can establish a transparent procedure in the work of the SJC. It remains to be decided a crucial question to establish the criteria and mechanisms for assessing the quality of work of individual magistrates, which is bound to carry professional liability. This is because the ratio of judicial officers per rata population of Bulgaria is 2.7, which is one of the highest in Eastern Europe, and the ratio of the gross salary of judges compared to the gross average salary in Bulgaria is one of the highest and it is second only to Romania. Guided by the principle „carrying the responsibility“ this article proposes a model of criteriawhich characterizes the mechanism for assessing the professional qualities of magistrates. Goal - setting criteria for assessing the quality of work of the judicial system, whose mechanism will influence the professional development of magistrates. Object – systems of action of the judiciary. Subject - evaluating the opportunities of the criteria for carrying professional liability of the magistrates of the judiciary, leading to achieve efficiency and minimize damage to the state budget of acts, omissions and their solutions.