IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2025i3p927-954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Homo Islamicus as the Basic Assumption of Islamic Economics: Evaluation and the Way Forward

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Sholihin
  • Catur Sugiyanto
  • Akhmad Akbar Susamto

Abstract

This paper systematically challenges essentialism’s concept of homo islamicus through rigorous critical examination and presents an alternative perspective rooted in the transformative paradigm. It extensively evaluates homo islamicus as a foundational concept in Islamic economics, drawing insights from contemporary Islamic economic scholars and modern sources. Four compelling reasons emerge for rejecting the homo islamicus concept. Firstly, it argues that homo islamicus altruism cannot exist in isolation from other factors. Secondly, as an ideal economic agent, homo islamicus is inherently susceptible to biases from uncertainty. Thirdly, cognitive constraints hinder homo islamicus from fully embodying Islamic teachings, termed “bounded-knowledge.†Lastly, the paper contends that homo islamicus is not fully functional. This paper is primarily normative and philosophical, lacking empirical experimentation. Nevertheless, it suggests potential for future empirical research on this matter. This critical perspective on homo islamicus assumptions sets the stage for reconsidering alternative ideas in the theory of Islamic economic agents. Rejecting the notion that homo islamicus is the cornerstone of Islamic economics initiates a substantial discourse to reassess its role in advancing Islamic economics as a legitimate science.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Sholihin & Catur Sugiyanto & Akhmad Akbar Susamto, 2025. "Homo Islamicus as the Basic Assumption of Islamic Economics: Evaluation and the Way Forward," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 927-954, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2025:i:3:p:927-954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/doi/eajournal/2025.3/EA.2025.3.15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2025:i:3:p:927-954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.