IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2025i3p845-862.html

Evolving Trends in Total Factor of Production, International Trade Openness and Economic Interactions among BRICS: Implications for Global Growth and Development

Author

Listed:
  • Rajesh Kumar

    (National Institute of Technology Agatala, India)

  • Debasis Neogi

    (National Institute of Technology Agatala, India)

Abstract

This research examines the evolving nature of the BRICS groups’ influence on the global economy by integrating pertinent economic measures and synthesising findings from a range of academic publications. In light of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa’s rise to global prominence, it is critical to grasp the significance of their economic alliance. Although some studies have touched on this topic, a thorough examination is required to either examine the complex relationships between trade openness, economic indicators, and GDP per capita in BRICS nations or to incorporate multiple separate findings. To address this knowledge vacuum, this study scours academic literature and economic statistics in search of fresh insights into the pros and cons of BRICS economic cooperation expansion. This study uses panel data analysis that spans the three decades from 1990 to 2019 to support its claims. The data comes from reliable sources including the World Bank and Penn World Tables. Among the BRICS nations, these findings highlight the strong correlation between trade liberalisation and GDP growth. These insights can be useful for economists, policymakers, and everyone else with an interest in developing countries’ capacity for international collaboration and sustainable economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajesh Kumar & Debasis Neogi, 2025. "Evolving Trends in Total Factor of Production, International Trade Openness and Economic Interactions among BRICS: Implications for Global Growth and Development," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 845-862, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2025:i:3:p:845-862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/doi/eajournal/2025.3/EA.2025.3.11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Busse & Jens Koeniger, 2015. "Trade and economic growth: A re-examination of the empirical evidence," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(4), pages 2862-2876.
    2. T. N. Srinivasan & Jagdish Bhagwati, 2001. "Outward-Orientation and Development: Are Revisionists Right?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Deepak Lal & Richard H. Snape (ed.), Trade, Development and Political Economy, chapter 1, pages 3-26, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Harrison, Ann, 1996. "Openness and growth: A time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 419-447, March.
    4. David H. Romer & Jeffrey A. Frankel, 1999. "Does Trade Cause Growth?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(3), pages 379-399, June.
    5. Edwards, Sebastian, 1993. "Openness, Trade Liberalization, and Growth in Developing Countries," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 1358-1393, September.
    6. Srinivasan Palamalai & Inder Siddanth Ravindra & Karthigai Prakasam, 2015. "Relationship between Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth and Trade in India," Journal of Economic and Financial Studies (JEFS), LAR Center Press, vol. 3(2), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Bashir Ahmad Joo & Sana Shawl, 2023. "Understanding the Relationship Between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in BRICS: Panel ARDL Approach," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 48(2), pages 100-113, June.
    8. Ernesto M. Pernia & Pilipinas F. Quising, 2005. "Trade openness and regional development in a developing country," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Harry W. Richardson & Chang-Hee Christine Bae (ed.), Globalization and Urban Development, pages 79-94, Springer.
    9. Thomas Gries & Margarete Redlin, 2012. "Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Panel Causality Analysis," Working Papers CIE 52, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    10. David Dollar & Aart Kraay, 2004. "Trade, Growth, and Poverty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(493), pages 22-49, February.
    11. Svetlana Ledyaeva & Mikael Linden, 2008. "Determinants of Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Russian Regions," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 5(1), pages 87-105, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L. G. Burange & Rucha R. Ranadive & Neha N. Karnik, 2019. "Trade Openness and Economic Growth Nexus: A Case Study of BRICS," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 54(1), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Charles Ackah, & Oliver Morrissey, 2007. "Trade Liberalisation is Good for You if You are Rich," Discussion Papers 07/01, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    3. Tripathi, Janhavi Shankar, 2023. "Trade-growth nexus: A study of G20 countries using simultaneous equations model with dynamic policy simulations," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 806-816.
    4. Niclas Berggren & Henrik Jordahl, 2005. "Does free trade really reduce growth? Further testing using the economic freedom index," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 99-114, January.
    5. Iyke Bernard Njindan, 2017. "Does Trade Openness Matter for Economic Growth in the CEE Countries?," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 3-24, March.
    6. Mullings, Robert & Mahabir, Aruneema, 2018. "Growth by Destination: The Role of Trade in Africa’s Recent Growth Episode," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 243-261.
    7. Arvind Panagariya, 2003. "Miracles and Debacles: Do Free-trade Skeptics have a Case?," International Trade 0308013, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Tarlok Singh, 2010. "Does International Trade Cause Economic Growth? A Survey," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(11), pages 1517-1564, November.
    9. Francisco Rodríguez, 2006. "Openness and Growth: What Have We Learned?," Wesleyan Economics Working Papers 2006-011, Wesleyan University, Department of Economics.
    10. Philipp Heimberger, 2022. "Does economic globalisation promote economic growth? A meta‐analysis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1690-1712, June.
    11. Miet Maertens & Liesbeth Colen & Johan F. M. Swinnen, 2011. "Globalisation and poverty in Senegal: a worst case scenario?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 38(1), pages 31-54, March.
    12. Wessel, Jan, 2019. "Evaluating the transport-mode-specific trade effects of different transport infrastructure types," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 42-57.
    13. Iti Vyas, 2020. "Whether the Economic Growth of India is Trade Openness Led?," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 8(1), pages 38-53.
    14. Agenor, Pierre-Richard, 2002. "Does globalization hurt the poor?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2922, The World Bank.
    15. Robert E. Baldwin, 2004. "Openness and Growth: What's the Empirical Relationship?," NBER Chapters, in: Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics, pages 499-521, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Jennifer Mbabazi & Oliver Morrissey & Chris Milner, 2001. "Are Inequality and Trade Liberalization Influences on Growth and Poverty?," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2001-132, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Mr. Allan D. Brunner, 2003. "The Long-Run Effects of Tradeon Income and Income Growth," IMF Working Papers 2003/037, International Monetary Fund.
    18. Chang, Roberto & Kaltani, Linda & Loayza, Norman V., 2009. "Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementarities," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 33-49, September.
    19. Kuo-Hsing Kuo & Cheng-Te Lee & Chen Fang, 2014. "Free Trade and Economic Growth," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1-2), pages 69-76, June.
    20. Wannaphong Durongkaveroj & Taehyun Ryu, 2019. "Relative effects of trade liberalization on poverty: Evidence from Thailand," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 19(4), pages 264-283, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2025:i:3:p:845-862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.