Author
Abstract
Artificial intelligence systems are gaining an increasingly significant place in contemporary life and affect human lives and economic development in a remarkable and irreversible way. However we should be alert about the risks robots might bring to the enjoyment of human rights. The dangers are related to the neglect, violation and sometimes exclusion of a number of rights that are of decisive importance for the well-being and security of every person. Such violations can lead to discrimination, inequality and social exclusion. The deficiencies in the understanding of the value of fundamental rights in self-learning robots is a fact we should be aware of. Nowadays intelligent machines are still just a tool for improving people’s lives. And yet as far as the protectiоn of human rights is concerned, the dynamic self-improvement and upgrading of artificial intelligence systems require human supervision and “ethical oversight†. Within this context it is important to develop algorithms for the protection of human rights that robots cannot modify even in their self-learning process. Rules should be legally established and unified, so that РI systems can only upgrade themselves in a human-preset direction. Otherwise they can develop in an unexpected way and affect common human values and achievements. Such rules should grant particular protection to people in a vulnerable position - the disabled, the children, the elderly and the sick, the poor and in certain cases - women. The study explores issues related to the impact of increasingly used intelligent systems on the economic, social, civil and political rights. Some of the most affected rights are the right to labour, a number of social rights, the freedom of movement, freedom of expression, the right to a fair trial and the protection of personal data. These rights should be protected and guaranteed through legislation at the international and national level, as well as through the consistent practice of the institutions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2024:i:2:p:439-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.