IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nup/jrmdke/v14y2026i188-107.html

Mapping the Relationship between Budget Process and Firm Performance: A Global Perspective Review

Author

Listed:

Abstract

A bibliometric and science-mapping review is performed in this study to display the intellectual structure and track the thematic evolution of studies on the relationship between budget processes and firm performance. Two hundred twenty-two documents published between 1990 and 2025, indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection, have been retrieved. Performance analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, co-citation analysis, and bibliographic coupling analyses are conducted using VOSviewer. Three main theoretical foundations are revealed by the findings: agency theory, contingency theory, and resource-based view. Their influence evolves from a traditional financial control approach toward behavioral, contextual, and strategic conceptualizations of budget. Thematic analysis further highlights emerging research foci related to digitalization, sustainability, governance, and strategic alignment of budgeting systems. A convergence trend among these theories in recent studies is also found by the results of this study-in particular relation to digitalization, sustainability, and strategic alignment. This paper systematizes highly fragmented literature; discovers unexplored research gaps; provides academic insight as well as practical implication for those academics or practitioners who intend to re-design budgetary systems as one of the strategic drivers enhancing organizational performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Thanh Thao NGUYEN, 2026. "Mapping the Relationship between Budget Process and Firm Performance: A Global Perspective Review," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 14(1), pages 88-107, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:14:y:2026:i:1:88-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/734
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:14:y:2026:i:1:88-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristian-Mihai VIDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmsnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.