IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v53y2000i4p1307-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federal Constitutional Limitations on Congressional Power to Legislate Regarding State Taxation of Electronic Commerce

Author

Listed:
  • Hellerstein, Walter

Abstract

Recent Supreme Court decisions taking a restrictive approach to Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause and a broader view of states’ immunity from suit under the Eleventh Amendment arguably cast doubt on Congress’ power to legislate a comprehensive solution to the problems raised by state taxation of electronic commerce. A fair reading of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decisions reveals that these concerns are unwarranted. In fact, the Court has reaffirmed the core Commerce Clause principles that accord Congress ample power to legislate regarding state taxation of electronic commerce. Moreover, whatever limits there may be on Congress’s power to create federal jurisdiction over nonconsenting states, Congress may employ a variety of methods, short of outright coercion, by which it may induce a state to adopt a legislative program consistent with federal interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Hellerstein, Walter, 2000. "Federal Constitutional Limitations on Congressional Power to Legislate Regarding State Taxation of Electronic Commerce," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 53(4), pages 1307-1326, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:53:y:2000:i:4:p:1307-26
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2000.4S2.03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.4S2.03
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.4S2.03
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2000.4S2.03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:53:y:2000:i:4:p:1307-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.