IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlrcf/114.00000076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Production by Institutions and Information Extraction by Underwriters in Hybrid IPO Auctions

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas J. Chemmanur
  • Pengfei Ma
  • Chaopeng Wu
  • Qianqian Yu

Abstract

We analyze the informational properties of hybrid IPO auctions using a large and unique database of institutional bids from Chinese IPO auctions. We find strong evidence of information production by institutions about the intrinsic values of IPO firms and of underwriters extracting and using this information in IPO pricing. The IPO offer price is more sensitive to bids from institutions able to produce more precise information. In particular, the offer price is more sensitive to bids from domestic institutions, compared to bids from foreign institutions who likely have less knowledge or experience about Chinese firms and the Chinese financial market due to geographic, legal, and cultural distances. Institutional bidding information also has predictive power for IPO initial returns and long-run post-IPO stock returns. Finally, institutions are compensated for their information production: institutions able to produce more precise information get significantly larger allocations in better performing IPOs; this difference in IPO allocations between better and worse performing IPOs is greater for institutions able to produce more precise information. Overall, “dirty” uniform price hybrid IPO auctions appear to be a reasonably effective alternative to the traditional book-building IPO mechanism, so that our analysis has important implications for IPO mechanism reform in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas J. Chemmanur & Pengfei Ma & Chaopeng Wu & Qianqian Yu, 2025. "Information Production by Institutions and Information Extraction by Underwriters in Hybrid IPO Auctions," Review of Corporate Finance, now publishers, vol. 5(3–4), pages 291-348, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlrcf:114.00000076
    DOI: 10.1561/114.00000076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/114.00000076
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/114.00000076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlrcf:114.00000076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.