IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlrbe/105.00000197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Process of Decision Making on the Use of Pensions for Financing Old Age: Muslim Workers Living in England

Author

Listed:
  • Alija Avdukic
  • Faizal Monjoo
  • Ataollah Rahmani
  • Ahmed Abdullah

Abstract

This study explores the role of religion in decision-making of the Muslim working communities for the use of interest-bearing pensions. In the absence of any theoretical framework on this topic, the paper explores the multiple socioeconomic factors that may influence the attitude, perception, motivation, and action of Muslim workers towards joining pension schemes for old age protection, by proposing the Muslim Workers’ Acceptance of Pension Model. The paper takes an exploratory `community-based participatory research’ (CBPR) methodology with an interpretivist approach in line with the social constructivist paradigm. It contributes to the broader debate on the effect of cultural, religious, and social values of marginalised communities on the inclusion and widening access for old age protection. It also provides insight into the factors and reasons of divergence from the available pension models. The findings emphasise that people sharing the same location do not necessarily share the same level of opportunities due to the intersectionality of race, religion, gender, and class.

Suggested Citation

  • Alija Avdukic & Faizal Monjoo & Ataollah Rahmani & Ahmed Abdullah, 2024. "Exploring the Process of Decision Making on the Use of Pensions for Financing Old Age: Muslim Workers Living in England," Review of Behavioral Economics, now publishers, vol. 11(4), pages 471-494, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlrbe:105.00000197
    DOI: 10.1561/105.00000197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000197
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/105.00000197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlrbe:105.00000197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.