IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnljmb/107.00000069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Long versus Short of It: The Last Consumer Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Masters , Tamara

Abstract

Checkout is the final point in a shopping trip and is perceived to capture the sum total of the shopping experience. However, in this paper we suggest that receipt length can play a significant role in determining the level of satisfaction with the shopping trip. Keeping everything constant, we predict that consumers would be more satisfied when they receive a longer than shorter receipt. Past research indicates that individuals infer elements of themselves by observing their behavior in different situations. In our context we suggest that length of a receipt, a task-uninformative feature, can trigger thoughts about effort expended while shopping. Consumers use receipt length to infer that they are being rewarded for their shopping effort. If commensurate, decision or physical, effort was expended then a long receipt can be perceived as tangible recognition for the effort invested. Across five studies we demonstrate what we refer to as the receipt-effect and test for the underlying effort-based explanation. We conducted studies in controlled settings and a field setting at a busy restaurant, which provide insight into marketing strategist.

Suggested Citation

  • Masters , Tamara, 2020. "The Long versus Short of It: The Last Consumer Experience," Journal of Marketing Behavior, now publishers, vol. 4(2-4), pages 133-171, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnljmb:107.00000069
    DOI: 10.1561/107.00000069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/107.00000069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/107.00000069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnljmb:107.00000069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.