IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnljmb/107.00000009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-Rationality in Cognitive Science

Author

Listed:
  • Stanovich, Keith E.

Abstract

The great rationality debate in cognitive science (Tetlock and Mellers 2002) has largely been conducted with a narrow view of human rationality in mind. A minority voice in the debate has been theorists who take a broader view of rationality — one that does not accept current desires and goals is given and that takes a longer view of decisions throughout a person’s life. Schwartz’s target article is clearly in the tradition of those advocating a broader view of how we conceive rationality. It has many affinities with the meta-rationality that I have previously advocated for decision science.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanovich, Keith E., 2015. "Meta-Rationality in Cognitive Science," Journal of Marketing Behavior, now publishers, vol. 1(2), pages 147-156, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnljmb:107.00000009
    DOI: 10.1561/107.00000009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/107.00000009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/107.00000009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inwon Kang & Haixin Cui & Jeyoung Son, 2019. "Conformity Consumption Behavior and FoMO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Individual Decision Making;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnljmb:107.00000009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.