IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlhpe/115.00000087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Arming the Enslaved: Different Paths Taken by the US and Confederate Congresses during the American Civil War

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffery A. Jenkins
  • Nicholas G. Napolio

Abstract

This article traces the history of legislation to arm the enslaved in the Union and Confederacy during the Civil War. By the end of the war, both Congresses had passed legislation arming slaves, but the paths in the North and South were quite different. Differences in political institutions — namely differences in legislative organization, partisan control of committees and procedures, and party majorities — resulted in a quicker journey to arming slaves in the Union led by the legislative branch, and an ineffectually slow journey in the Confederacy stymied by the national legislature. The large Republican majorities in the US Congress — thanks largely to the absence of the Southern states and their Democratic legislators — greased the legislative wheels for action, whereas the slimmer majorities of former Democrats in a nonpartisan Confederate Congress led to sclerosis and a lack of decisive legislative action. In the end, Black federal troops fought in several key battles in the last years of the Civil War and were a positive factor in Union victory, whereas Black Confederate troops were never fully organized and did not see combat.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffery A. Jenkins & Nicholas G. Napolio, 2025. "Arming the Enslaved: Different Paths Taken by the US and Confederate Congresses during the American Civil War," Journal of Historical Political Economy, now publishers, vol. 5(1), pages 21-58, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlhpe:115.00000087
    DOI: 10.1561/115.00000087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/115.00000087
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/115.00000087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlhpe:115.00000087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.