IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlhpe/115.00000081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meritocracy Reimagined: Ideational Foundations of State-Building in Imperial China

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Peng

Abstract

Imperial China's bureaucracy is often seen as a meritocracy, shaping views on state development. This paper challenges that idea, arguing the meritocratic model is too simplistic. I define meritocracy as formal exams, assessments of administrative and technical skills, and equal competition for office. Using a dataset on Qing prefectural governments and a text analysis of Confucian classics, I show that power came through multiple paths, exams focused on literary and ethical teachings, and office access was uneven across regions. Despite this, the Civil Service Exams projected ideational power by promoting loyalty and a shared elite worldview, shaping cultural identity. This study deepens our understanding of meritocracy and state formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Peng, 2025. "Meritocracy Reimagined: Ideational Foundations of State-Building in Imperial China," Journal of Historical Political Economy, now publishers, vol. 4(4), pages 439-469, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlhpe:115.00000081
    DOI: 10.1561/115.00000081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/115.00000081
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/115.00000081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlhpe:115.00000081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.