IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlhpe/115.00000038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Library of Babel: How (and How Not) to Use Archival Sources in Political Science

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Lee

Abstract

The use of archival sources is understood to be an important research tool, but the problems involved have rarely been distinguished from the broader difficulties of interpreting qualitative sources. Attempts to use archival material for hypothesis testing, as opposed to description or theory development, are confounded by the large size and often opaque structure of archives; factors which lead to misinterpretations of evidence and a tendency to confirm the author's expectations. This paper discusses common features of archival materials, and shows how they can compound traditional research design problems. It then proposes a set of best practices for avoiding these problems, most notably the use of strong and explicit sampling procedures. These practices are illustrated using a brief discussion of material from the National Archives of India on the 1975 Emergency.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Lee, 2022. "The Library of Babel: How (and How Not) to Use Archival Sources in Political Science," Journal of Historical Political Economy, now publishers, vol. 2(3), pages 499-526, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlhpe:115.00000038
    DOI: 10.1561/115.00000038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/115.00000038
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/115.00000038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlhpe:115.00000038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.