Author
Listed:
- Y. I. Kuzminov
- E. V. Kruchinskaia
Abstract
The year 2026 marks the 250th anniversary of Adam Smith’s “An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations”, the work that had laid the foundations of economic science. The three factors of production Smith implicitly introduced — labor, land, and capital — no longer operate in their pure form: the digital and even non-digital sectors generate no profit without data, technology, and infrastructure, which calls into question the universality of the original system. This gap cannot be ignored: an economy in which the digital sector, comprising three times fewer industries than the physical sector, contributes twice as much labor input to output growth and in some cases leads in productivity growth rates is structured differently from the one Smith described. According to BEA–BLS data for 63 U.S. industries over 1997—2023, this gap is not cyclical: it registers a structural change in the very system of factors of production. The central question of this paper is not historical reconstruction but method: what would Smith have said had he seen digital platforms, and how would he have rethought his own categories? The same question is posed regarding the economists Smith directly influenced and who developed the theory of market organization, the firm, and consumer surplus — Marx, Marshall, Pigou, Schumpeter, Coase. The paper proposes a procedure of returning to the theoretical core that makes it possible to trace the evolution of factors of production from the original triad to a system that includes data, technology, and infrastructure, and to test this evolution through the sequence of these theorists. The analysis shows that the propositions formulated by the classics retain their validity on the whole yet begin to operate under conditions where market boundaries become, in essence, infinite. A transparent market open to small players has emerged, and economic science must reckon with this, and market power is shifting to the ownership of the digital assets that underpin it. Economic analysis of the information society, digital platforms, and artificial intelligence requires rebuilding the “hard core” of science, abandoning its textbook-based learning. Ultimately, such analysis is essential for informed decision-making, but economists must overcome the disease of neglecting the fundamental foundations of their theory.
Suggested Citation
Y. I. Kuzminov & E. V. Kruchinskaia, 2026.
"250 years of Smith’s work: How digital platforms bring us back to the core of economic science,"
Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 7.
Handle:
RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2026:id:6235
DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2026-7-5-27
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2026:id:6235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.