IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprec/y2026id5845.html

Russian stock exchanges’ adaptation during military conflicts: A comparative historical analysis (1913—1919 and 2021—2026)

Author

Listed:
  • S. A. Perekhod

Abstract

The article examines the institutional adaptation of Russian exchange institutions under limit regimes — war and a sanctions-induced infrastructural rupture — when the policy priority shifts from competitive price discovery to preserving settlement continuity, collateral valuation, and the controllability of intermediaries’ balance sheets. The main comparison covers 1913—1919 and 2021—2026, while the 1998 Russian crisis is used as a control episode to test the limits of the “financial fortress” concept. The paper argues that the 1918 “grey market” was not an analogue of today’s over-the-counter segment but a symptom of the collapse of public price formation after the dismantling of private property rights and the repudiation of the previous debt order. By contrast, the post-2022 trajectory unfolded under the preservation of private property, corporate legal continuity, and the rights of domestic investors. Consequently, a “financial fortress” is defined not merely as technological segregation and a sovereign-debt anchor, but as a coordinated regime combining legal continuity of ownership rights, macroeconomic discipline, national settlement infrastructure, segmentation of the external perimeter, and a domestic investor base.

Suggested Citation

  • S. A. Perekhod, 2026. "Russian stock exchanges’ adaptation during military conflicts: A comparative historical analysis (1913—1919 and 2021—2026)," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 6.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2026:id:5845
    DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2026-6-118-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/viewFile/5845/2854
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/0042-8736-2026-6-118-134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2026:id:5845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.