IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprec/y2025id5528.html

Competition among digital scientometric platforms: Foundations, limitations, and expected effects on Russian economic science

Author

Listed:
  • A. E. Shastitko

  • A. L. Zyubina

Abstract

The article examines the impact of the monopolization of the digital scientometric platform services market in Russia. Special attention is given to the analysis of methodological and technological limitations of Russia’s leading provider of scientometric data — eLIBRARY (RSCI) platform, including slow and partial innovations, limited integration into the international scientific community, and insufficient instrumental support for the methodological aspect of scientometric evaluation. The relationship between industrial and competition policy tools is considered for overcoming existing barriers for alternative scientometric solutions. The design of mechanisms for these two economic policy directions becomes particularly significant in light of structural alternatives for scientometric and bibliographic support of research activities. The article proposes ways to eliminate coordination flaws resulting from the monopolization of the digital infrastructure of scientific communication. Competitive pressure can be increased through agile technology companies capable of correctly integrating modern artificial intelligence and machine learning solutions with the methodological specifics of the scientific context.

Suggested Citation

  • A. E. Shastitko & A. L. Zyubina, 2025. "Competition among digital scientometric platforms: Foundations, limitations, and expected effects on Russian economic science," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 9.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2025:id:5528
    DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-142-158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/viewFile/5528/2785
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-142-158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2025:id:5528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.