IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprec/y2022id3813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social economics: What do economists refuse to recognize? (On the book by A. Witztum “The betrayal of liberal economics”)

Author

Listed:
  • M. S. Sushentsova

Abstract

The review examines the main ideas of the book by the British economist Amos Witztum “The betrayal of liberal economics”. The main aspect of betrayal, which the author reveals, is manifested in the rejection of modern economic theory from the liberal basis of its classical predecessor, which assumed the social conditionality of individual actions in the economy. With the help of the achievements of anthropology and comparative neuroscience, in particular, relying on the hypothesis of the “social brain”, the author formulates a thesis about the human intrinsic sociality. Based on it, the author characterizes the behavior model focused on the significance of relationships — as opposed to market signals, as “expressive” rationality, and at the same time, the impossibility of reducing it to economic instrumental rationality — due to the opportunistic nature of the latter. Thus, the author exposes the unjustifiability of “faith” in market competition as an effective mechanism for allocating resources and an acceptable social guideline, recommending economists to fight for its containment instead of propaganda, using the classical conceptual framework developed by A. Smith and J. S. Mill.

Suggested Citation

  • M. S. Sushentsova, 2022. "Social economics: What do economists refuse to recognize? (On the book by A. Witztum “The betrayal of liberal economics”)," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 3.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2022:id:3813
    DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2022-3-132-146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/viewFile/3813/2454
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-3-132-146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2022:id:3813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.