IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2020i4p214-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis Of State Occupational Safety And Health Management Models

Author

Listed:
  • Ekaterina Kuznetsova

Abstract

The safety and health of the working population are the cornerstones of social development. The social and moral aspects of the issue are signifi cant, but one should also take into account the economic losses caused by the presence of harmful and dangerous working conditions. The volume of underproduction due to absence of workers because of the industrial injury or occupational disease, according to the International Labor Organization annually constitutes almost 4% of world GDP. All this necessitates the transformation of state management of labor protection from regulatory control through risk assessment to a safety culture. The article examines the main stages in the development of approaches to public management of labor protection in the UK, Australia, the USA, Japan and Russia from the point of view of models and characteristics of labor protection management. The purpose of the research is to identify common features and stages, as well as assess the effectiveness of the measures being implemented. It has been concluded that approaches to OSH management are developing in parallel with the development and transformation of the economy; in countries with a federal structure they become aware of the need for uniformity of legislation in the field of labor protection; after the establishment of framework requirements in the field of labor protection, the main task of the state is to provide serious methodological assistance to employers in ensuring safer and healthier workplaces, as well as the general well-being of the working population.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekaterina Kuznetsova, 2020. "Comparative Analysis Of State Occupational Safety And Health Management Models," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 214-242.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2020:i:4:p:214-242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2020:i:4:p:214-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.