IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2016i2p49-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic Barriers to Innovative Business in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Eferina
  • Natalya Kochkina
  • Victoriya Lizunova
  • Darya Prosyanyuk

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of monitoring and evaluation of the government innovation policy. The focus is on the importance and availability of instruments of the government support at the regional level.The authors concluded that the government policy failed to provide a proper degree of the problem solution to ensure the modernization of the economy. Financial and non-financial support business is evaluated as being very important but not available enough. One of the key problems is the jitter in strategic documents and tools for implementation both at the federal and regional levels.The authors propose to set up regular assessment of the existing barriers to innovation at the regional level and compare them with each other.The article is based on the results of two surveys: business representatives, potential and actual recipients of state support, innovation business included. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the satisfaction of recipients of support and other counterparts of the quality of public institutions` interaction. As a result, the level of awareness about the activities of state development institutions was determined, and the degree of compliance with the quality of interaction between state development institutions to the expectations of support recipients was set.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Eferina & Natalya Kochkina & Victoriya Lizunova & Darya Prosyanyuk, 2016. "Systemic Barriers to Innovative Business in Russia," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 49-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2016:i:2:p:49-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2016/06/28/1115850935/%D0%95%D1%84%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0,%20%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0,%20%D0%9B%D0%B8%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0,%20%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%8E%D0%BA%202-2016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luigi Aldieri & Maxim Nikolaevich Kotsemir & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2018. "Knowledge spillover effects: empirical evidence from Russian regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2111-2132, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2016:i:2:p:49-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.